CIO Applications Europe
About UsConferencePartner With Us
Close
  • Applications
      • Business Intelligence & Analytics
      • Call Center Solutions
      • CRM & Customer Experience
      • Data Center
      • Digital Transformation
      • E-Invoicing
      • Intelligent ERP & Automation
      • Risk Management & Compliance
      • Unified Communications (UCaaS)
  • Industries
      • Automotive & Mobility
      • Construction & Infrastructure
      • Financial Services
      • Healthcare
      • Retail & E-commerce
      • Telecom & Media
      • Travel and Hospitality Tech
  • Technologies
      • Cloud
      • Cybersecurity & Resilience
      • Data Engineering & Analytics
      • Generative and Agentic AI
      • IoT & Edge Computing
      • Robotics
  • Platforms
      • AWS
      • IBM
      • Microsoft
      • Salesforce
      • SAP
      • ServiceNow
  • Leadership Perspectives
  • Innovation Insights
  • Research
  • News
  • CXO Awards
    • Europe
      • US
  • Topics

  • Menu
      • Business Intelligence & Analytics
      • Cloud
      • Digital Transformation
      • Generative and Agentic AI
      • Microsoft
      • Risk Management & Compliance
      • Travel and Hospitality Tech
      • Unified Communications (UCaaS)
  • Microsoft
  • Risk Management & Compliance
  • Travel and Hospitality Tech
  • Generative and Agentic AI
  • Digital Transformation
  • Business Intelligence & Analytics
  • Cloud
Topics
  • Topics

  • Business Intelligence & Analytics
  • Cloud
  • Digital Transformation
  • Generative and Agentic AI
  • Microsoft
  • Risk Management & Compliance
  • Travel and Hospitality Tech
  • Unified Communications (UCaaS)
  • Home
  • Managed iT Services

A featured contribution from Leadership Perspectives: a curated forum reserved for leaders nominated by our subscribers and vetted by the Construction Tech Review Advisory Board.

St. James’s Place Wealth Management

Tari Dogra, Head of Division, IT Service Management

Customer Satisfaction Surveys- Good Practices

Customer surveys have been around for decades. But why are they conducted? The answer is usually to get verification on the fact that the service being provided, or product being sold, is good and seek feedback on areas of improvement. In the retail industry, new surveys may be conducted on user experience.

Are such surveys effective? Firstly, let us explore the common types of surveys that are conducted. There is the telephone call from a customer service team, usually at an inconvenient time, asking you for a couple of minutes of your time to complete the survey on the service you received. In my experience, a lot of people politely decline; however, some will answer the questions if their experience has been good. Is this a fair representation of the service?

"In my experience, a lot of people politely decline; however, some will answer the questions if their experience has been good. Is this a fair representation of the service"

You then have the email with a link to complete a survey. The link will usually take you to answer several questions and may have a free text box allowing you to leave your comments on the delivered service or product or your experience of using a website.

Follow up of the poor customer reviews has been appreciated by the customers as it displays the team’s dedication toward serving the best to them


Any more than three questions and people lose their interest. So, in my experience completion rates on such surveys are very low, typically less than 10 percent.

There is also the survey which can gauge your experience by pressing on icons (smiley faces/emojis), like the buttons you can press outside the services at airports, shops, and malls. Some also add the ability to leave feedback through a free text box for additional feedback. These allow you to express your buying experience through a single click and/or leave feedback, if you feel like it. Such types of surveys have a slightly higher rate of completion due to a single click, so the response rate can be between 10-50 percent.

There is nothing wrong with any of the above modes of conducting surveys, it is dependent on each organisation’s choice of faith in the mode they choose. So, how many do follow up on the feedback received? The follow up requires firms to hire resources that analyse the feedback and then communicate to relevant managers on improvement areas for staff and services/systems. How many organisations have this luxury?

Large corporates may have a customer service team, but in IT teams this responsibility usually falls to the IT Service Management team. This team’s primary focus is on ensuring that the IT services offered to the internal or external customers are fit for purpose, thereby providing a good experience and ensuring that the survey results meet their KPI or CSAT targets.

Good practices would suggest a follow up on a bad score or negative feedback left by the customer. How many companies do this? A practice I have introduced is that for a Poor feedback, checking the incident or requesting the feedback relates to see if the issue was dealt properly by the team, reviewing the feedback, if any has been given, and then calling the end user/customer to check what could have been done if the issue was dealt correctly by the resolver team.

This sort of follow up has been appreciated by the customer as it displays the team’s dedication toward serving the best to the customers and that the survey responses are not going into a black hole. A simple yet effective way of appeasing a unhappy customer.

The articles from these contributors are based on their personal expertise and viewpoints, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of their employers or affiliated organizations.
The Leadership Perspectives forum brings together voices shaping construction technology and innovation. Participation is by invitation only. It features leaders who are not merely observing technological change, but actively contributing to it through digital transformation and execution-driven insights.
EDITOR'S CHOICE
  • Willis Towers Watson

    Legal & General

    Building Technology Foundations That Last

    Mark Hall, Group Chief Technology Officer

  • Willis Towers Watson

    Adp Uk

    "Shift left" Defect Discovery using Agile and DevOps

    Keith Watson, Director Of Devops

  • Willis Towers Watson

    Motor Oil

    Trust, Security Strategy and the AI-Driven Threat Landscape

    Syngelakis J. Christos, Group Data Protection Officer

  • Willis Towers Watson

    Swiss Re [SWX: SREN]

    A Future of Enhanced Human Work

    Sergio Chelli, IT Procurement Manager at Swiss Re [SWX: SREN]

Weekly Brief

loading

I agree We use cookies on this website to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies. More info

×
#

CIO Applications Europe Weekly Brief

Be first to read the latest tech news, Industry Leader's Insights, and CIO interviews of medium and large enterprises exclusively from CIO Applications Europe

Subscribe

loading

THANK YOU FOR SUBSCRIBING

CIO Applications Europe
Follow on LinkedIn

About

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Partner With Us

Stay Connected

  • Subscribe
  • Newsletter
  • Sitemap

Contact Us

  • editor@cioapplicationseurope.com
  • sales@cioapplicationseurope.com
  • marketing@cioapplicationseurope.com

Legal

  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

© 2026 CIO Applications Europe. All rights reserved. Headquarteblue in Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.

This content is copyright protected

However, if you would like to share the information in this article, you may use the link below:

https://managed-it-services.cioapplicationseurope.com/leadership-perspective/customer-satisfaction-surveys-good-practices-nid-1573.html